DAC vs AOC: Which One Fits Your Data Center Needs?
2025-05-11 16:44:11
🔗 DAC vs AOC: Which One Fits Your Data Center Needs?
As data centers scale up for higher speed and efficiency, choosing the right cabling is crucial. Two popular options for short-range connections are DAC (Direct Attach Cable) and AOC (Active Optical Cable). But which one is right for your setup?
Let’s break it down 👇
⚙️ What is DAC? (Direct Attach Cable)
Type: Copper-based cable with transceiver ends
Data Rate: Supports 10G to 400G
Typical Reach: Up to 7 meters
Connector: Passive or Active transceivers (SFP, QSFP, etc.)
Use Case: In-rack or adjacent rack connections
✅ Pros:
Cost-effective
Low power consumption
Low latency
❌ Cons:
Limited distance
Bulkier cable
🔌 What is AOC? (Active Optical Cable)
Type: Fiber-based cable with built-in optics
Data Rate: Supports 10G to 400G+
Typical Reach: Up to 100 meters
Connector: Integrated optical transceivers
Use Case: Between racks, rows, or across data halls
✅ Pros:
Longer reach
Lightweight and flexible
Immune to EMI (Electromagnetic Interference)
❌ Cons:
Higher cost
Slightly higher power usage
📊 Quick Comparison Table
| Feature | DAC | AOC |
|---|---|---|
| Cable Type | Copper | Fiber |
| Reach | ≤ 7 meters | Up to 100 meters |
| Cost | Lower | Higher |
| Power Consumption | Very Low | Low to Medium |
| EMI Resistance | Moderate | Excellent |
| Flexibility | Less flexible | More flexible |
| Application | Short-distance, in-rack | Mid-range, between racks |
💡 Which One to Choose?
Choose DAC if:
You need a cost-effective, low-latency solution for short distances (inside the rack)
Choose AOC if:
You need more flexibility and longer reach (between racks or across rooms)
#SateOptics #DAC #AOC #DataCenterSolutions #HighSpeedCabling #ConnectivityMatters #NetworkInfrastructure #TechExplained #OpticalTransceivers #400G #FiberOpticCables #SFP #QSFP #SateKnowledgeShare
Previous:40G QSFP+ MTP vs 40G QSFP+ LC Transceivers
Next:😆 “Why Compatibility Matters: Not All Optical Transceivers Are Created Equal” 👇


